Read More : Google Tests QR Code Verification for Messages

Starting in late 2026, Android apps installed outside of the Play Store on certified devices. Will need to be registered by a verified developer. Google believes this change will better protect users from malicious actors who distribute malware or scams through third-party channels.

To support this transition, Google is launching a dedicated Android Developer Console for developers who distribute apps outside of its official store. This new platform will allow developers to authenticate their identities and register their app package names before making them available for sideloading.

Google compared the new verification step to “an ID check at the airport,” emphasizing that the process confirms the developer’s identity but does not review or moderate app content. This measure will not prevent developers from distributing their apps via other app stores or websites. Instead, it adds a protective layer without limiting open distribution.

Rollout to Begin in 2026, Targeting Global Sideloading Security Improvements

Google will begin rolling out the developer verification requirement in late 2026 across Brazil, Singapore, Indonesia, and Thailand. A broader global rollout is expected to follow, though no specific timeline has been announced. Most Android devices in the U.S. and Europe already meet the certification requirement since they ship with Google Play pre-installed.

The new system aims to preserve user choice while increasing safety. Google is not restricting app sideloading but is making it harder for anonymous developers to spread harmful software. By tying apps to verified developers, the company hopes to improve accountability and traceability.

The policy is a significant move toward mitigating threats associated with sideloading while maintaining Android’s open ecosystem. Developers who operate outside the Google Play Store will now have a secure way to establish trust with users. Encouraging wider acceptance of their apps.

Read More : How to Prevent Grok Chats from Appearing on Google

As threats from malware and phishing continue to rise, this initiative reflects Google’s ongoing commitment to mobile security. Once fully implemented, the verification process could reduce the risk of malicious apps reaching users via unofficial channels.

Users can expect clearer indicators of developer authenticity in the future, helping them make safer decisions when installing apps. Meanwhile, developers will need to plan ahead and prepare for the upcoming verification process if they wish to distribute apps outside Google Play without disruption.

The post Google to Block Sideloading of Unverified Android Apps appeared first on Amynicole.

Read More : UK Drops Demand for Apple to Allow Data Backdoor

The proposed settlement, filed recently, now awaits final approval from a judge. If approved, the agreement would apply to children who were 13 or younger and watched YouTube videos between July 1, 2013, and April 1, 2020. According to Reuters, lawyers representing the plaintiffs estimate that the class could include 35 million to 45 million individuals.

This latest settlement follows similar legal action taken in 2019. When the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) fined Google $170 million for COPPA violations. In that case, YouTube was accused of collecting personal data from children without consent on videos clearly aimed at a young audience. As part of the FTC agreement, Google and YouTube committed to halting such data collection practices and promised future compliance with COPPA regulations.

Legal Scrutiny Continues Over YouTube’s Handling of Children’s Data

Though the $30 million payout resolves the current class-action lawsuit. It represents a smaller financial impact compared to the $170 million fine imposed in 2019. Critics argue that these penalties remain minor relative to Google’s overall revenue. Raising concerns about the effectiveness of enforcement actions in changing corporate behavior.

Under U.S. law, COPPA mandates that websites and online services targeting children must obtain verifiable parental consent before collecting personal information. YouTube has long faced criticism for blurring the line between general content and content designed specifically for children, making enforcement difficult.

The 2019 FTC settlement led YouTube to roll out new policies limiting data collection on content marked for children. However, this class-action suit suggests that violations may have continued for years before those changes took effect.

Read More : Nvidia Showcases AI NPCs, RTX Tools at Gamescom

Legal experts note that the large number of potential class members could pose logistical challenges for distributing settlement funds, especially in verifying eligibility. Final details on how the funds will be allocated have not yet been disclosed.

This case highlights the growing legal and regulatory scrutiny tech companies face regarding children’s privacy online. As concerns over digital safety continue to rise. Both government agencies and private citizens are increasingly turning to legal action to hold platforms accountable.

Looking ahead, Google may face pressure to further tighten compliance policies. Increase transparency, and ensure YouTube’s systems do not collect unauthorized data from young users. The case serves as a reminder that data privacy, especially involving minors, remains a key focus for both regulators and the public.

The post Google Settles Child Privacy Lawsuit for $30 Million appeared first on Amynicole.

Read More : Trump’s Team Eyes Intel Investment to Strengthen Tech Sector

Telstra and Optus could not install competing search engines on their devices during the agreement period. In return, Google shared a portion of its advertising revenue generated from searches on those devices with the carriers. This arrangement was in place from December 2019 to March 2021.

Google acknowledged that these contracts likely reduced competition substantially. The ACCC emphasized that limiting competition harms consumers by reducing choices, increasing costs, or lowering service quality. ACCC Chair Gina-Cass Gottlieb highlighted the fine’s timing, noting that AI-powered search tools are now disrupting traditional search markets. She pointed out that these innovations increase competition, allowing consumers to explore new search options on their mobile devices.

Unlike previous investigations where Google contested allegations, this time the company admitted liability and cooperated with regulators. Google proposed the fine amount, and now a court will decide if this punishment is appropriate. The company’s approach contrasts with its past response to a European antitrust fine exceeding $5 billion, after which Google introduced a search provider choice screen for EU Android users in 2020.

Industry Impact and Future Measures to Promote Competition

Following the fine, Telstra and Optus agreed with the ACCC not to enter similar exclusive search deals with Google in the future. This move aims to encourage more open competition among search engines on mobile devices in Australia. The fine and the agreement mark a significant step toward increasing market fairness in the search engine space. By preventing telecom companies from locking devices into one search provider, consumers should experience more diverse options and better services.

The ACCC also highlighted the broader context of AI innovations transforming search. With AI search tools becoming more prevalent, competition in the search market is expected to intensify, offering users improved alternatives. This ruling aligns with global efforts to regulate Big Tech companies and foster fair competition. It also signals that regulators will closely scrutinize deals that potentially limit consumer choice.

Read More : Meta Faces Senate Scrutiny Over Child Chatbot Concerns

Google’s cooperation with the ACCC and its acceptance of the fine indicate a willingness to work within regulatory frameworks moving forward. As AI and mobile search evolve, the company and regulators will likely continue discussions on maintaining a competitive and consumer-friendly environment.

Overall, this case highlights the growing regulatory focus on technology firms’ market power. It also shows the importance of adapting rules to keep pace with technological change and protect consumer interests. The $36 million fine is not just a penalty but a message to tech giants about fair competition and innovation’s role in consumer choice.

The post Google to Pay Australia $36M Over Mobile Search Deal appeared first on Amynicole.

Read More : Razer BlackShark V3 Pro Released with ANC and 70-Hour Battery

The AEA system could have sent its highest alert level, called “Take Action,” to around 10 million people within 98 miles of the epicenter. This alert provides up to 35 seconds of warning, enough time to seek safety. However, Google sent only 469 Take Action warnings during the first quake.

Google’s system works on Android devices, which make up over 70% of phones in Turkey. It uses data from millions of phones to detect shaking and estimate earthquake strength. The system’s “Take Action” warning triggers a loud alarm, overrides Do Not Disturb modes, and demands immediate attention. A less urgent “Be Aware” alert informs users of lighter shaking but does not override silent modes.

Despite the system being live during the quake, it significantly underestimated the shaking. For the first earthquake, Google’s system estimated the magnitude between 4.5 and 4.9, far below the actual 7.8. As a result, the severe alerts failed to reach most users. A second large quake later that day also received an underestimated response. The system sent Take Action alerts to just 8,158 phones and Be Aware alerts to under four million users.

Google researchers later published their findings in the journal Science, highlighting limitations in the detection algorithms. They acknowledged that tuning alerts for large magnitude quakes remains a global challenge for earthquake early warning systems.

Improvements and Challenges Ahead for Google’s Earthquake Alerts

Following the Turkey earthquake, Google adjusted its algorithms and re-simulated the event. The updated system generated 10 million Take Action alerts for high-risk users and 67 million Be Aware alerts for those farther from the epicenter. Google emphasizes that AEA is a supplementary tool and not a replacement for national early warning systems.

Some experts, however, express concern about over-reliance on technology that is still developing. Elizabeth Reddy, assistant professor at Colorado School of Mines, criticized the slow release of performance data. She stressed that the delay was unacceptable given the loss of life and the importance of timely warnings.

Harold Tobin, director of the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network, urged transparency about system performance. He warned that some regions might mistakenly rely solely on Google’s alerts instead of maintaining their own robust warning systems.

Read More : AltBalaji App Banned by Government Over Obscene Content

Google states that post-event analysis has improved AEA’s accuracy. The system now issues alerts in nearly 100 countries, demonstrating its expanding global reach. However, questions remain about its reliability during major events.

Google also monitored AEA’s performance during a 2025 earthquake in Myanmar but has yet to share findings. The Turkey earthquake highlighted the urgent need for constant testing, algorithm refinement, and clear communication about the capabilities and limits of such technology.

Moving forward, Google aims to refine AEA further to enhance alert speed and accuracy, especially during large magnitude quakes. Combining advanced tech with government warning systems and public preparedness is essential to saving lives. Google’s transparency and ongoing improvements are key steps toward building trust in earthquake early warning technologies worldwide.

The post Google Missed Alerting Millions on Turkey Earthquake Severity appeared first on Amynicole.

Read More : Google Previews Pixel 10 Ahead of Official Launch

Chrome now enables seamless account switching and strict data separation on iOS. This mirrors the functionality already available on Android and Chrome for desktop. The browser keeps tabs, browsing history, passwords, and other data tied to the account in use. This ensures that business information stays isolated from personal browsing activities.

When a user signs in or selects their work account, Chrome begins an onboarding flow. This process explains the difference between personal and managed accounts. It also outlines how their employer may handle data associated with the managed profile. Each time a user switches to a managed account, Chrome clearly notifies them that they are entering a work-managed environment. This update addresses the increasing demand for privacy and control in mixed-use environments. It allows professionals to access corporate tools without compromising the integrity of personal data stored on the same device.

Enhanced Enterprise Controls Strengthen Chrome for IT Teams on iOS

Alongside the user-facing improvements, Google has introduced new enterprise-grade controls for IT administrators managing Chrome on iOS. Companies using Chrome Enterprise can now apply URL filtering policies specifically to managed work accounts. This ensures that employees on iOS devices follow corporate browsing guidelines, even when using personal hardware.

Security teams can also stream audit logs from Chrome on both iOS and Android directly into the Google Admin console or any connected SIEM system. These capabilities were previously limited to desktop environments and now offer greater visibility across mobile devices.

Read More : UK Considers Ending Push for Apple Encryption Backdoor

The changes offer a more secure and manageable browsing experience in BYOD scenarios. They help companies protect sensitive data, monitor compliance, and maintain visibility into how employees interact with digital resources.

By extending these features to iOS, Google shows a commitment to supporting cross-platform enterprise use cases. IT teams gain a higher level of control, while employees benefit from a clear boundary between work and personal digital activity.

These updates position Chrome as a more viable solution for organizations managing mobile workforces. As mobile device usage grows in professional settings, features like account-based data separation and enterprise-level controls are becoming essential. Looking ahead, the move could signal further developments in mobile browser management tools, as companies demand more robust BYOD support across operating systems.

The post Google Updates iOS Chrome With Account Separation Tools appeared first on Amynicole.